Faborino is our own store: Conseto runs on it, live
Faborino is a Montessori furniture e-shop we built and operate ourselves. This is not a client testimonial: it is Conseto running on real production traffic. Every figure on this page carries the date it was read.
These four figures are a snapshot as of 30 Aug 2026, not live data. A later reading: 1,150 human visits in the last 30 days, read on 23 Sep 2026.
The most honest case study we have
It is easy to claim a product works. We wanted proof we could stand behind, so we run Conseto on Faborino, a Montessori furniture e-shop we built and operate ourselves. Every number on this page comes from production, not from a demo account, and says when it was read.
- One script, no separate GA4 setup
- Consent banner running in production
- The same dashboard we sell to customers
- Nothing staged, nothing hidden
A problem GA4 cannot see
Search Console data pulled through Conseto showed queries ranking in position 1 with zero clicks on them: a SERP snippet problem, not an authority problem. GA4 only tracks what happens after a click. It cannot tell you why nobody clicked in the first place.
- 4,696 impressions and 122 clicks in 28 days, as of 30 Aug 2026
- Top-ranking queries with zero clicks found
- Root cause: the snippet, not domain authority
- A finding GA4 cannot produce by construction
What runs on Faborino
The same modules we sell, running on our own traffic, with consent handled from the start.
Cookie consent
A consent banner with Consent Mode v2 support, running on the store we use every day.
Real visitor insights
Pageviews, visit analysis and scroll depth, all without third-party cookies.
E-commerce events
Product views, add-to-cart and purchase events, read from the store's dataLayer when the store pushes them.
Two banner tests on our own traffic
Both tests ran on Faborino, our own shop, on a few hundred views: a direction, not a law. The winner of each is now the Conseto default.
Blocking dialog vs corner card
Run on faborino.com to 30 August 2026: a blocking dialog with a full-page backdrop and stacked buttons, against a non-blocking card in the corner with buttons side by side. Not a clean test of placement alone.
- Far more visitors made a choice with the dialog than with the corner card
- The accept share among those who decided was about the same in both layouts
- Refusing stayed one click on the first screen in both layouts
- The dialog is now the default for every site on Conseto
A bug put visitors whose settings never arrived into the corner group, and those visitors rarely decided. We are citing the direction only, until this is re-measured without them.
What the banner says
30 August to 23 September 2026, 410 banner views: plain wording ("Essential cookies always run. Analytics and marketing only run if you agree. You can change this any time.") against a version whose middle sentence says why tracking is good for you ("Analytics helps us improve the shop, marketing shows offers that fit you, both only with your consent.").
- Decided (accepted or rejected), of all views: 61.3% with the plain text against 64.6% with the benefit text (p = 0.49, not significant)
- Accepted all, of all views: 45.3% against 40.9% (p = 0.37, not significant)
- Rejected all, of all views: 15.1% against 22.7% (p = 0.048)
- Accepted all, among those who decided: 73.8% against 63.3% (p = 0.07, not significant on its own)
Only the rejection gap crosses the usual 0.05 line, and we did not correct for testing four comparisons at once. The plain text is now the default everywhere because it produced fewer flat refusals, not because it clearly won on every measure.
Check your own site's consent rate in your Conseto dashboard.
Faborino belongs to us: it is not a paying customer and we did not pay it for a quote. We show it because it is the one case study we can prove end to end, on data anyone with access to the dashboard can check.
Ready to simplify your stack?
Replace multiple tools with one intelligent layer. Start free, no credit card required.